In 2004, the UK consumer protection group, Which?, brought Apple iTune’s unfair pricing practices to the attention of Britain’s Office of Fair Trading. Which?, previously known as The Consumers’ Association, contended that UK consumers were being charged unfairly for purchases made through Apple’s iTunes Music Stores for song downloads to Apple iPods.
The Office of Fair Trading eventually turned this matter over to the European Commission, noting that since Apple iTunes Stores operated in many European countries, the European Commission was better suited to investigate the complaint.
While American consumers were paying $.99 per downloaded song, consumers in the UK were paying the equivalent of $1.53 per song. Meanwhile, European customers were paying the equivalent of $1.33 per song, which is approximately twenty percent less than the UK customers’ cost. The price for European consumers was consistent across all countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, and Spain). The addition of a Canadian iTunes store in December, 2004 further fueled the fire, as Canadians were charged the equivalent of $.83 per song.Not only were UK iTunes customers charged more for their purchases, but they were not allowed to enter any of the other European countries’ iTunes Stores to buy songs at a lower rate. Credit card information was used to determine the consumers’ countries of residence, blocking nonresidents from access to any given store. Eddy Cue, an Apple executive, defended this practice by stating, “The costs do vary by region for Apple.” He explained that the market, taxes, and Apple’s music costs fluctuate according to each country.In reference to the UK’s increased iTunes prices and the fact that purchasing music from another country’s iTunes Music Store was prohibited, Phil Evans, principal policy advisor for Which?, remarked, “UK consumers are getting a raw deal from Apple.” He further stated, “We’re campaigning for free movement of goods and services in Europe, and we’ll take on any company, or group of companies, that seek to carve up the market to their benefit.” After three years, the announcement was made in January, 2008 that the fight for lower iTunes song prices in the UK had been won. The European Commission communicated that Apple agreed to decrease the price of iTunes song downloads in the UK by ten percent. The price change would take effect by July, 2008. . Neelie Kroes, European Union Competition Commissioner, stated, “The Commission is very much in favor of solutions which allow consumers to benefit from a truly single market for music downloads.” The European Commission’s findings included verification that Apple did not have agreements with any major record companies that would lead to an outside influence on how iTunes Stores operated in Europe.
Although Apple agreed to a decrease in iTunes prices for the UK, they made it clear that several record companies also need to lower their prices for music distribution. Apple will no longer accept being charged a higher price for music distribution in the UK than in the European countries and will discontinue agreements with any company that continues this practice.


Maylin



February 22, 2008
I find it kind of interesting that Apple threatened to seperate with companies that continue a practice that it just got done defending on its own merit. Business is business, except when you do business with me. I don’t see hoew this can be anything other than a PR statement. Are there really any record companies out there that can afford to lose its Itunes revenue? I don’t think so. But how many are willing to go back and negotiate every artist contract in order to save themselves? I don’t think people realize that this is once again, going to fall on the artist. So much for digital media setting the artist free.
February 22, 2008
Argh. A vicious circle situation, then? Apple charges a lot in Britain for iTunes, but by the same token it gets charged a lot for content from record companies? Is that the upshot?
Frankly, I hope the issue can be solved amicably. From my neutral standpoint, it looks as though this could be resolved through compromise by all parties.
February 25, 2008
I just thought I would pop in and also comment that I think that it is a shame that so called consumer groups would step in to protest the price of digital music downloads but no one seems to try to take courts to task on the energy cost situation. I do not think that most consumer groups care about consumers what so ever. They get their money from their members, and sure that more than a few people more worried about European economics send in their dues every month just to make sure that the “consumer” is represented by their agenda.
February 27, 2008
Wow, this is a mess….I wish they would find a way to resolve it in a quick manner and possibly find a way to lower download prices. I hope Apple and the UK’s office of free trading get this done soon.
February 29, 2008
When you deal with things like this, you simply must ask what is really going on here. I think they are trying to do what they need to business wise but at the same time they are not trying to lose customers. Hopefully this all gets worked out so that the customer is not the one hurting.
March 3, 2008
I really wonder if there are consumer groups in Britain that are watching this closely. It does seem, as the title says, a raw deal for Apple and Apple users on that side of the pond. Its too bad that the government there is highly regulated and will tax just about anything that a person uses there.
I will reiterate what I said in a previous post, that this gets resolved in a timely fashion, but if not, I hope that someone out there gives a voice to people there and show that this is a very unfair situation.