Apple as whole has a mystique and iconic value. Iconic as it may be, it currently faces a classic conundrum. Companies become strongly identified with the leaders who lead them. Instead, they need to become institutions independent of their leaders. The difference between a cult and a religion is the one that outlasts its founder. It means no single individual is above the institution. This problem in Apple’s reputation could make people stop, notice and sidle away one day.
Rakhesh Khurana, a professor of
Of course, the very thought that Apple could change enough to let the Apple executives try stuff without Steve’s approval is alarming to us Apple enthusiasts and it is pretty much radical. But that is exactly what Khurana says might be the downfall of the Apple brand. It remains to be seen whether Apple is a cult or a religion. Only time shall tell.


Maylin



May 10, 2008
I think that it’s a little over the top to call apple a cult or a religion. And apple should be looked at as “apple’s steve” not “steve’s apple”. And I don’t see apple going downhill any time soon. I didn’t know that steve also works with disney and pixar. That’s a lot for one person to do.
May 20, 2008
Well, let’s suppose that Jobs is never fired (by Apple’s Board of Directors) or resigns before he dies. Say that he lives on another 15-20 years or so. Does this mean that Apple will disappear once its CEO passes away? Should it?
I don’t think it’s a great idea, quite frankly, to make a company so dependent on its founder for input on product development and innovation. It’s unfair to the other talented people at Apple, and it’s unfair to Steven Jobs, as well.